|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NH: A question for gun advocates
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The privilege of driving a car comes with a set of responsibilities for ensuring that the car is not used recklessly as a weapon against society. So too should gun ownership. If you keep a gun in your home for self-defense, then it is your responsibility to make sure that you only use it when you have exhausted all other means of keeping your home safe from intruders. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(8/25/2018)
|
| The writer by her own admission is not responsible enough to own a firearm and use it for self defense. But she apparently feels she has the right to dictate to others how they should act. She might be well advised to mind her own damn business. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/25/2018)
|
| HOW MANY GUDDAM TIMES MUST WE POINT OUT THAT DRIVING IS A PRIVILEGE AND BEARING ARMS IS A RIGHT? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/26/2018)
|
We have a "set of responsibilities" for owning a gun. It is called THE LAW. Learn it, understand it.
exhausting all other means of keeping your home safe is not part of the criteria. Fear of imminent death or grave bodily harm is. This threat is often so immediate that a challenging game of 3D chess with the assailant is not an option. You defend yourself or die.
Police are great people. But an assailant's knife or bullet will reach you before their radio car will pull in your driveway. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
