|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
DC: Gun Advocate Emily Miller To Leave Fox 5 Station
Submitted by:
David WIlliamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Emily Miller, the chief investigative reporter for Washington, D.C.'s Fox 5 (WTTG) is leaving the station following the expiration of her two-year contract with the outlet.
Miller became known during her tenure at Fox 5 for using her role a reporter to advance a pro-gun agenda, leading the station to eventually disclose after criticism that she was "a proponent of Second Amendment rights." Controversy also arose surrounding the revelations that she had largely fabricated her story of being a "home invasion" victim, which she said propelled her into pro-gun advocacy. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/2/2016)
|
What a transparent hit piece, chock-full of unsubstantiated allegations.
But hey, that's MediaMutters for ya. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
