|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
GA: Christie Heckled By Second Amendment Activists At Red State Gathering
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Following his remarks at the Red State Gathering Friday, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican presidential candidate, was confronted by Second Amendment activists demanding to know why he has not thrown out the charges against a North Carolina man who was found with a firearm by New Jersey police.
Christie was hurried off stage when he decided against talking to reporters en masse that is covering the Red State event and spent most of his remaining time there hiding from the media. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(8/8/2015)
|
| Crispy Cream can't control what goes in or out of his mouth. He is a bully when he is cornered on the gun issue. He hails from a state deeply in debt and with no freedom. There is a tax on rainwater on your roof. He does not trust us why should we trust him? |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(8/8/2015)
|
| Our 'creamsicle' governor has never had a positive gun rating dating back to his days as a prosecutor. More recently he had ample opportunity to veto a baker's dozen of anti-gun law put on his desk and chose to cherry pick those he thought least offensive to the overflowing contingent of NJ gun owners that besieged legislative hearings on these laws. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
