|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
N.Y. Gun Control: Surrender Privacy to Own Firearm
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
New York State Senator Kevin Parker wants to use the First Amendment rights of would-be gun buyers to prevent them from exercising their Second Amendment rights in an effort that privacy groups are opposing, according to CNY Central.
The Brooklyn Democrat reportedly doesn’t care about the privacy of honest citizens who want to have a firearm. It appears the plan is aimed at chilling the desire of anyone to own a gun. |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/5/2018)
|
How about proposing a law that would allow law enforcement to actually arrest elected officials, that are knowingly breaking their oath of office under the color of law, in continual attempts to deprive law abiding citizens of their rights protected by the Constitution of the United States of America? How about that?
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|