|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Two Women Prevent Robbery With Sex-Positive Self-Defense
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Two women working at a shop in California engaged in some sex-positive self-defense when they fended off a robber using the only weapons they had available: dildos.
Surveillance footage being circulated on Twitter shows a man with a gun attempting to rob Lotions and Lace, a shop in San Bernardino. Instead of opening the cash register, the two women behind the counter started launching dildos at the would-be robber to keep their store safe. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(12/17/2016)
|
Sigh:
Of course, when a robber comes in with a gun — whether you think it's real or fake — it's always unwise to fight back. Law enforcement encourages anyone in a stick-up situation to give the robbers money rather than risk their lives defending a cash register. But, since this was successful, and done in the most hilarious, sex positive way possible, we're glad these ladies defended themselves. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/18/2016)
|
| I don't believe dildos would stop bullets. Bad dangerous example cited here on top of bad humor attempt. Note the state the story took place in. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.... We've been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of government himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price. — Ronald Reagan |
|
|
