
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun safety over NRA propaganda
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Unfortunately it appears that any time an individual starts a conversation with the word 'gun' in it, the walls go up and the posturing begins, as all the extremists race to the far corners of their respective fiefdoms."
"Guns are neither good nor bad, but more importantly, I believe that gun-safety laws are good and responsible. Over the course of my 25 years in health care, emergency and transplant medicine, I have seen firsthand the tragedies of irresponsible gun owners, and that, despite the significance of lives lost, the tragedy of preventative measures blocked at every turn by National Rifle Association zealots." ... |
Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/26/2015)
|
Gee, the writer got thru one sentence without "erecting an anti-gun wall " of his own ! So much for a reasonable examination and debate of the issues ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|