|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(8/31/2020)
|
| A vote for any dimocrat, especially Biden and Harris, is a vote to lose our second amendment rights. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/31/2020)
|
True; but our right to defend ourselves is already under serious attack.
Look at the 17 year old Rittenhouse kid, any reasonable look at the time line of events would lead anyone who has any sense to conclude he was defending himself and very likely would have died or atleast have been very seriously maimed had he not fired the weapon.
Yet HE'S being charged with murder.
The libtards are trying to reframe the event to say HE shot the protestors and the PROTESTORS are the VICTIMS. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/31/2020)
|
Rittenhouse is getting railroaded. He was attacked and they were trying to take his rifle.
Unfortunately, he has already been convicted by the press. Tucker Carlson was condemned just for saying that a 17 year old felt he had to get involved because the government failed in their responsibility to protect the citizens and their businesses.
I am waiting to hear how the victim in the shooting in Austin fares. That incident seems to have fallen out of view. At least in Texas he has a good chance of receiving fair treatment. In Texas he needed killing is still a recognized defense. As far as I can determine, the basement dwelling demonstrator that died was not contributing anything to society.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
