|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NM: Judicial Candidate Gives Answer to Gun Question
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Asked to name his favorite firearm at a GOP candidate forum Monday evening, judicial hopeful Chris Nedbalek produced an answer that was startling for its boldness, even for an audience that prizes guns and gun rights among its most treasured political and social values. Nedbalek replied that for hikes in the Hondo Valley he prefers his AK-47 assault rifle “and a couple of 30-round magazines,” because aggressive dog packs roam the area, and a solitary hiker might not be safe without enough firepower to stop a dozen or more at once. |
| Comment by:
jdege
(5/11/2016)
|
| Personally, my favorite is the Browning HB. It'd be my EDC, if I could find a decent IWB holster. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
