|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
hisself
(7/6/2016)
|
Starts off with a lie!
Assault weapons may be NOT BE banned without violating the Second Amendment! Why? "These weapons are not commonly used for self-defense in the home." SO WHAT? The Second Amendment has no clauses regarding use in the home, it simply states that the government may NOT infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms. It is MY RIGHT to carry any arm which I can. No exceptions!
Assault weapons bans, machine gun bans, sawed off shotgun bans - ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/6/2016)
|
M4s are becoming far more popular for home defense, so the ignoramus who wrote it needs to update his information.
It is also true that it doesn't really matter if anyone uses them for defense. I don't think that antigunners really know what "shall not be infringed" really means. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
