
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Man’s fondness for guns creates dangerous situations
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In a recent column Eugene Robinson asks why we can’t pass gun safety legislation in this country. He notes that guns killed over 43,000 Americans last year – more than 19,000 homicides and 24,000 suicides. We have a problem, yet we do nothing.
The facts are clear. Owning a gun does not make us safer. It makes us more likely to get murdered. It makes a member of our household far more likely to be shot by the gun we own than the very slim chance that we use it in self-defense. It makes us a target for theft because thieves like to steal guns. And a gun in the house dramatically increases the chance that a member of the household who tries to commit suicide will succeed. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/16/2021)
|
Let's ignore the 1-2 million incidents each year in which law abiding people lawfully defend themselves and loved ones with guns.
Because facts are really inconvenient and ruin our storyline. |
Comment by:
jac
(4/16/2021)
|
It makes me safer. If I called the police I would be lucky if they showed up in 20 minutes.
And whether or not this stooge realizes it, it makes him safer too. There would be a lot more robberies, burglaries, assaults and murders if the criminals didn't have to worry about encountering a victim with a gun.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/16/2021)
|
"The facts are clear."
Indeed they are, but instead of debunking the author's misinformation masquerading as "facts," let me state the one preemptive fact that he can't ignore:
Bearing arms is a fundamental, natural right. In the United States, fundamental, natural rights are recognized and constitutionally protected. None of the rest of his 'argument' matters.
That one fact castrates his opinion. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|