|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Anti-Gun Extremist Invents Call For Armed Insurrection
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In responding to NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre’s CPAC speech, gun control advocate Ladd Everitt falsely claims that the NRA has long called for armed insurrection, but can provide no real proof of that claim.
Everitt argues that NRA spent the run-up to the election urging group members to be ready to grab their guns and defend freedom to the point of “insurrection” if Donald Trump lost. But his argument is more than suspect, and the supporting data is even weaker. |
Comment by:
dasing
(3/3/2017)
|
The NRA promotes defence of firearm owners, NOT murder! |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/3/2017)
|
The link she'sa no worky. |
Comment by:
-none-
(3/3/2017)
|
kalipornia separatist gun collections:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6d/90/ce/6d90cebaed4b6803501c20344263bd87.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/90/ac/1a90ac9548dc5f2e59b3236d821a723e.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/39/41/2e/39412e6dfeb2d506035f2d91d58eb8e5.jpg http://media.bizj.us/view/img/1239001/scottferber4nerfjb*750.jpg -
pull down state on list: https://act.nraila.org/default.aspx |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|