|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IN: Not worth the shot
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
If you’re a licensed hunter in Indiana, depending on the season, you can kill a deer with any of a wide variety of weapons – shotguns, handguns and rifles, muzzle-loaders, and bows and crossbows. But you can’t use rifles that fire certain high-powered cartridges.
The Indiana Natural Resources Commission is asking for comments on a proposal to allow hunters to use these more powerful weapons.
The commission, which sets the regulations enforced by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, could make a decision by May, in time for next fall’s deer-hunting season. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/3/2015)
|
Maybe I missed it, but what - specifically - "more powerful" cartridges are these folks talking about ?
Billy Dixon shot a Commanche war chief off his horse at a over a half-mile a the "Battle of Adobe Walls" (later certified by the USArmy), with a cartridge most would consider "underpowered" by current standards.
Seems to me legislation predicated more upon ignorance, (or contempt) of the science of ballistics than practicality. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
