|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SAF Sues Over Michigan Agency’s Gun Regulations for Foster Parents
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Michigan, challenging that state’s regulations on firearms ownership and use for anyone seeking to become a foster parent. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan against Nick Lyon “in his official capacity as director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). It alleges that the agency has violated the civil rights of four people under color of law.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/18/2017)
|
Let me get this straight: The judge says that he knows that the court is violating constitutional rights, but is upholding the illegal mandate regardless?
WTF is THAT? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
