|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Uncommon1
(6/8/2016)
|
| Because an unloaded firearm can be used as a club instead. Where do these people come from? |
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/8/2016)
|
The same persecutor who sued the county for not giving her enough money to hire staff (she openly admitted that she had 40 known murderers she wasn't prosecuting because she didn't have the staff to press charges against them) is now saying she has her staff drafting legislation.
Which is it, Kym Worthless?
Are you too understaffed to handle murder prosecutions, or are you so overstaffed that all your prosecuting chores are done and you have staff left over for legislative lobbying?
Or, maybe you keep your staff too busy doing things that aren't in your job description that you don't have any staff left over for even the most important prosecutions of murderers and rapists?
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
