
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Anti-Gun Extremist Invents Call For Armed Insurrection
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In responding to NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre’s CPAC speech, gun control advocate Ladd Everitt falsely claims that the NRA has long called for armed insurrection, but can provide no real proof of that claim.
Everitt argues that NRA spent the run-up to the election urging group members to be ready to grab their guns and defend freedom to the point of “insurrection” if Donald Trump lost. But his argument is more than suspect, and the supporting data is even weaker. |
Comment by:
dasing
(3/3/2017)
|
The NRA promotes defence of firearm owners, NOT murder! |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/3/2017)
|
The link she'sa no worky. |
Comment by:
-none-
(3/3/2017)
|
kalipornia separatist gun collections:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6d/90/ce/6d90cebaed4b6803501c20344263bd87.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/90/ac/1a90ac9548dc5f2e59b3236d821a723e.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/39/41/2e/39412e6dfeb2d506035f2d91d58eb8e5.jpg http://media.bizj.us/view/img/1239001/scottferber4nerfjb*750.jpg -
pull down state on list: https://act.nraila.org/default.aspx |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|