|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Elmer Fudd will not use a gun in new 'Looney Tunes' cartoons
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Elmer Fudd has made a big change for the newest series of "Looney Tunes" cartoons. In the latest update of the series -- called "Looney Tunes Cartoons" and streaming on HBO Max -- the iconic character will no longer use a gun, according to the people behind the show. “We’re not doing guns,” executive producer Peter Browngardt told The New York Times. “But, we can do cartoony violence — TNT, the Acme stuff. All that was kind of grandfathered in.” |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(6/8/2020)
|
| Another American icon gone to hell because of political correctness |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/8/2020)
|
| Just more liberal indoctrination of our children. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/8/2020)
|
Ditto to the above two posts.
On a slight veer: it sounds like they'd be better of with Wile E. Coyote and the Roadrunner. Lots of Acme contraptions but no guns, 'cuz, ya know, coyotes don't use guns.
Just Rube Goldberg contrsptions. ;) |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/8/2020)
|
| Of course. 'Had to happen. Who else but the original Fudd would give up his guns without so much as a murmur? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
