|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Why Would A Gun-Ban Group Change Its Name?
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libetyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
What do you do when your gun-ban group becomes so persistent in pushing restrictive laws for law-abiding gun owners that more and more people begin to realize where you really stand on gun ownership? For Gabby Giffords’ group, so-called Americans For Responsible Solutions, the answer is to change your name to further hide your goals. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/20/2017)
|
| Hey, it worked for Handgun Control, Incorporated. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(10/20/2017)
|
| It is NOT about standing up to the gun lobby for change, it is about standing up to the American people to remove their rights!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
