|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Violence Policy Center accuses gun industry of secret advertising, or something
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Josh Sugarmann, executive director of the rabidly anti-gun Violence Policy Center (one of the few domestic 'gun control' groups still brazen enough to publicly advocate an outright ban of private ownership of handguns), has long argued that the gun industry depends on marketing increasingly 'lethal' firearms in order to keep customers coming back for more."
"Today is the last day of the SHOT (Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade) show, in Las Vegas. Writing in the Huffington Post, Sugarmann claims that, 'Behind Closed Doors in Vegas, Militarized Gun Industry Sells, Sells, Sells,' and comes across as rather incensed that not just anyone is welcome at the show:" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/26/2015)
|
Another transparent example of the anti-gun crowd's "transference principle" in action. Doubtless the VPC, (and co-conspiring anti self-defense cabals), are attempting to deflect criticism of their collective apotastic retribution modus operandi on firearms supporters.
Their attack on the SHOT show, (an industry trade show intended to secure retailers), only shows the inherent insecurity of the VPC, et al. Were they legitimate critics with a moral and reportorial conscience they might well have been invited to attend. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
