|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: International students need to speak out against campus carry
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
“Campus Carry? What does that mean?” I asked when a Florida Coalition to Keep Guns Off Campus board member first contacted me last year.
Being an international student from the UK, I wasn’t well versed with what was happening in the Florida Legislature. So I delved into the topic on Google, finding as much information as I could on the subject. To say I was shocked at the possibility of allowing people who have concealed carry permits to bring their firearms on to campus is an understatement. But campus carry bills HB 4001 and it’s companion bill, SB 68, sponsored by Rep. Greg Steube, are gaining ground. The NRA, Students for Concealed Carry and other gun lobbyists are pushing hard for it to pass. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(11/20/2015)
|
| Disarmament works so well in Paris. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
