|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Police Attitudes on Armed Self-Defense are Changing
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"It was not very many years ago that the common refrain echoed by the media after any self defense shooting was that the police advise against 'taking the law into your own hands' along with the obligatory 'leave it to the professionals.' It’s hard to know how much of this reflected actual police attitudes, and how much was what the media wished to portray as police attitudes, but that was conventional wisdom. Over the last two decades, however, that stance has changed. Now, much more often, we hear comments like, 'homeowners have a right to defend themselves'; 'you will have to protect yourself and your family'; and 'get training so that you can do the right thing' . . ." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/6/2015)
|
| LEOs in rural areas have always relied upon residents as their "go to" backup support when they know time is critical and another badge is often a half-hour away. Now, our more urban LEOs are seeing the wisdom of their more rural brethren. When you may be targeted by anyone for no reason whatsoever besides a badge and uniform, having helping pairs of eyes is a good thing. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
