|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/23/2019)
|
"This is not, by any means, a part of some conspiracy to take an individual's guns away," said Senator Taylor.
Okay, so what's it do?
Oh, wait....
.....IT TAKES INDIVIDUALS' GUNS AWAY.
I mean, really. Is this not classic Red Queen insanity? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/23/2019)
|
Yes it is. More and more reasons will be found to "red flag" someone. Even in states that already have these laws it is near impossibke, or very costly, to get the guns back.
In one state, a man had his guns taken when it was KNOWN he was NOT the actual targeted person.
It DID NOT matter: BE STILL CANNOT GET HIS GUNS BACK!!!!!!!
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
