|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
gruhn
(1/22/2017)
|
This must have gotten scrambled on the transcription table. Here, let me correct it for you :
"Will US President Donald Trump's administration uphold citizens’ legal right to bear arms to protect themselves...?"
And while we're at it, let's note that it isn't "the USA" that is being discussed. It is the "federal government of the USA." Different entities.
And note that it reads "at every level of our judicial system." Not "We'll take positive legislative action," just "we'll file a friend of the court and wring our hands when we lose because of bad precedent or hostile judges. 'Hey, _we_ upheld it. Our hands were tied by historic forces."
Will the REALLY defend your rights? We'll see. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
