|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: Stop repeal of conceal and carry
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Wisconsin state assembly is seeking to repeal a concealed and carry law, which would allow 18 year olds to bring guns onto school property, into police stations and jails, and reduce related penalties. It even allows people to carry tasers and “shine” animals in wildlife refuges while carrying a weapon. The bill removes training and permit requirements for anyone who wants to carry a concealed weapon. This bill goes too far. Tell your Wisconsin representatives to protect our kids. Time is running out. Tell them now to vote "no" on Assembly-Bill 247. |
| Comment by:
netsyscon
(9/22/2017)
|
| There are already states that are doing this. The results. NO PROBLEMS. Except the state is not making a fortune on the permitting. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/22/2017)
|
'Tell ya what, Mailey.
The instant you accept poll taxes and literacy test requirements as constitutionally permissible to control voting, I'll accept mandatory government permission as constitutionally permissible to control carrying a firearm.
How's THAT sound....? |
| Comment by:
dasing
(9/22/2017)
|
| This article has too many lies associated with it !!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
