|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
No Right to Automatic Weapons
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.” — Justice Antonin Scalia, District of Columbia vs Heller, 2008
Freedom of the press does not protect libel. Freedom of speech does not guard child pornography. Freedom of religion does not allow human sacrifice. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/24/2018)
|
| Maybe, maybe not, but the limited power delegated to the government is. The architects' of the Constitution made it very clear: Government was not to exercise any power not delegated to it by the Constitution. Freedom of power to the government is limited. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/24/2018)
|
Trouble is, the govt. definition of a machinegun is NOT met by the idiot bumpstock which doesn't alter the "one trigger pull= one bullet fired" nature of SEMI automatic.
The way this ban is written is dangerous, it establishes precedents that will endanger our rights in the future.
And, as to the title, yes the 2A right includes full auto.
Does ANYONE know what the word "INFRINGE" Means?
BUY A DICTIONARY!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
