|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Bogus "Study": You're More Likely to Be Shot By Cop in Pro-Gun States
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork,com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Northeastern University came together to study the correlation between states' gun ownership and officer-involved shootings. The researchers published their findings in the Journal for Urban Health. Their grandiose takeaway: if you live in a state with "looser" gun laws – AKA you're allowed to utilize your Second Amendment rights – then you're more likely to be shot by police officers.
|
| Comment by:
jac
(10/16/2018)
|
You're more likely to be shot by a cop if you break the law.
Law abiding people rarely get shot by a cop. It happens, like in Dallas where a cop shot a man in his apartment, but it is an aberration that is not statistically meaningful.
Cops shooting criminals doesn't bother me in the least. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/16/2018)
|
| jac, since cops mistakenly shoot and kill people about twice as often as cops get killed on duty, would you say that cop deaths are statistically insignificant too? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| We'll take one step at a time, and the first is necessarily - given the political realities - very modest. We'll have to start working again to strengthen the law, and then again to strengthen the next law and again and again. Our ultimate goal, total control of handguns, is going to take time. The first problem is to slow down production and sales. Next is to get registration. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and ammunition (with a few exceptions) totally illegal. — Pete Shields, founder of Handgun Control, Inc., New Yorker Magazine, June 26, 1976, pg. 53 |
|
|
