|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Background Checks Do Not Infringe on Our Rights
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In his Sept. 18 column, Dave Skinner once again missed the mark. With his all too common complaint about how the federal government can’t do anything right, Mr. Skinner now targets firearm background checks. Rather than celebrate that background checks kept 181,000 firearms from being sold to criminals last year he lambasts the federal government for not prosecuting the offenders. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/28/2019)
|
No comment provision on that site.
The writer thinks that if a constitutional violation that doesn't bother him is so small as to be no big deal, he needs a good smack.
There is no, like ZERO, authority delegated to the federal government in the Constitution to regulate private sales of firearms or anything else.
If he wants his state to enact them and it doesn't violate its own constitution, well, have at it.\
But at least know WTF is happening, and why or why not. |
| Comment by:
AFRet
(9/28/2019)
|
| Hey dude, how about a backround check on fools like you before you are allowed to write an article like this...sounds good to me. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(9/28/2019)
|
OK, then how about a common sense background check before anyone can cast a vote in a federal election.
Right to vote and right to bear arms both protected by the constitution, so shouldn't be a problem now should it? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
