|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(9/10/2019)
|
| Expansion...You see.. one foot in the door, and they move for more, with no end in sight until their goal of total unconstitutional confiscation has been achieved. Serve not Rule. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/10/2019)
|
Why stop there? Why not let anyone that has a beef against you ask the courts to take away your rights?
That's what the politicians want. More ways to disarm the entire population.
Except, the criminals will still have their guns. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/10/2019)
|
jac -
"Except, the criminals will still have their guns."
Allow me to rephrase that:
"Except, the criminals AND THE GOVERNMENT will still have their guns." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
