|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/29/2016)
|
Opponents are misrepresenting the issue, which is arbitrary denial of services and backdoor registration.
First, denial of services for refusing to answer non-medical-related questions that invade privacy is viewpoint discrimination, which is unconstitutional. Next is the inclusion of gun data in the patient's medical files, which is completely inappropriate and becomes a de facto registration of the patient owning guns.
The intrusion into private information peripheral to a patient's medical treatment primarily to satisfy the physician's philosophical opposition to gun ownership is improper. Anti-gun doctors rationalize it as necessary to providing treatment, but that is a falsehood.
They ought to know that WE know what they are up to. |
| Comment by:
AFRet
(2/29/2016)
|
| Just answer NO. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
