|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jdege
(12/27/2017)
|
| I'll consider using a handgun that depends upon batteries when we have batteries that have a 0.00001% failure rate after 30 years in a shoebox under the bed. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/27/2017)
|
| Once this camel's nose gets under the tent flap, plan on sleeping with a camel. |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/27/2017)
|
Nobody wants these. The military doesn't want them. Police don't want them. Sportsmen don't want them. People that concealed carry don't want them.
The only people that want them are the flaming liberals that don't buy guns anyway.
There is no market for "smart" guns and anyone attempting to manufacture them will go out of business. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
