|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/29/2021)
|
Answering the title:
No. It doesn't.
For the nineteen-TRILLIONTH time, the Bill of Rights doesn't GRANT anything.
Outdoor Life is terminally infected with Fuddism. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/29/2021)
|
Besides my complaint about Fuddism, the article is wrong on another point. It asserts that there is a 'solid' 6-3 conservative majority on the Court. It is NOT 'solid,' it is in flux.
Which is vexing, but there you have it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.— Benjamin Franklin Historical Review of Pennsylvania. [Note: This sentence was often quoted in the Revolutionary period. It occurs even so early as November, 1755, in an answer by the Assembly of Pennsylvania to the Governor, and forms the motto of Franklin's "Historical Review," 1759, appearing also in the body of the work. — Frothingham: Rise of the Republic of the United States, p. 413. ] |
|
|
