|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NM: Prosecutors: No Charges in Shooting at Albuquerque Car Wash
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Authorities say a man who fatally shot another man during a confrontation at a car wash in Albuquerque will not be charged with a crime.
Bernalillo County District Attorney Raul Torrez said Friday that there was not enough evidence to obtain a conviction of James Morales.
Morales claimed he shot 59-year-old Earl Roybal on March 26 in self-defense. Torrez called the death a tragedy that never should have happened but said he lacks evidence to convict given the self-defense claim. |
Comment by:
mickey
(6/3/2017)
|
I can't find the surveillance video but from the descriptions I found, it sounds like Roybal was wiping his bike down in the bay, Morales drove up and told him to clear out so he could use the bay, Roybal approached Morales to tell him to piss off, words were exchanged, punches were exchanged, and Morales shot Roybal, claiming Roybal threw the first punch and that Roybal said he had a gun (he did, but he apparently wasn't the type to draw a gun in a fistfight).
Sounds to me like either of them could have avoided the violence by choosing not to be an ****. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|