| 
            
              | 
 | 
                
                
                  
                    | 
                              
                                   
                                        | 
                              
                              
                              NOTE! 
                               
                              This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
                      free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
                      Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
                      reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
                      any other living person besides the one who posted them.
                      Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
                              comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
                              Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
                              bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
                              other small-minded people.  Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
                              
                              
                                         |  
                         
                         The
                      Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
                         
                                       
                                            
                      
     
  
    | WA: The Second Amendment is not about guns Submitted by: 
			
Mark A. Taff
 Website: http://www.marktaff.com
 | 
			There 
				are 4  comments 
			 	on this storyPost Comments | Read Comments
 |  
    | The term keep and bear arms in the 18th century did not mean storing a weapon in your home or carrying it around on your person. The term meant that one could serve in the Militia, in 21st century terms, be a part of the military. Bearing arms was about fighting in the army or navy. Thus what the framers were talking about was not preventing persons serving in the military.
 
 In 21st century language the Second Amendment would read: “A trained and disciplined armed force is necessary to the security of a free State; therefore persons who choose to be part of that armed force shall not be prevented from serving.”
 |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     Sosalty
     (3/4/2017) |  
    | Liberal tripe.  Your neighbors were the militia, ready to respond to a minute man messenger on horseback in short notice, thus their name "minute' men." |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     MarkHamTownsend
     (3/4/2017) |  
    | It's a letter to an editor by yet another ignoramus  who does not understand what "the right of the people" means.  Nothing really to see here other than yet one more example of our crumbling ejumakashun system. |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     dasing
     (3/4/2017) |  
    | 2A is not about guns, it is about arms, all arms used in war or any arms used at home. Some of the ****had cannons at home , also! |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     laker1
     (3/4/2017) |  
    | Its a self evident truth that this person has brain damage and should be added to the gun ban list. I am sure that he would agree that a brain damaged person should not buy a gun. |  
 
 |  |  
              | QUOTES
                TO REMEMBER |  
              | 
                    
                      | America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy.  She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She well knows that by one enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standards of freedom.  — JOHN QUINCY ADAMS (1821) |  |  |