|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TN: Constitutional Rights vs. Public Safety: Tennessee Debates Guns in Parks and Civic Centers
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A major shift in Tennessee’s firearm landscape is moving through the General Assembly as lawmakers respond to a landmark judicial decision. On Wednesday, March 18, 2026, the Tennessee House Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hear House Bill 2064, a piece of legislation that could fundamentally change where and how Tennesseans can legally carry firearms.
The bill, sponsored by Representative Chris Todd, follows a high-profile ruling from August 2025 in which a three-judge panel declared Tennessee’s “intent to go armed” and “parks” statutes unconstitutional. The court ruled that these laws improperly criminalized the core Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(3/19/2026)
|
| HOW is this even a debate in Tennessee? Public property where public access is guaranteed, is public, and subject to our rights. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
