|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Amazon Partner GoDaddy Allegedly Kicks Pro-Gun Site Off Servers
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Web hosting service and Amazon partner GoDaddy allegedly removed AR15.com from its servers, forcing the site to shift to a backup URL to say visible. The Washington Examiner reported that AR15.com presents itself as “the world’s largest online firearm community.” It is a place where members can get ask each other questions about guns and gun accessories, and enjoy a vibrant exchange of ideas related to the Second Amendment. But the site is now searching for a new hosting service. |
Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(1/12/2021)
|
GOOD! ar15.com is a bad forum anyway run by some real lowlifes no better than zuckerberg. It's not a pro liberty board by any stretch and they worship government as bad as the moveon commies. AR15.com is populated by just a tiny group of paranoid old guys who like their echo chamber. They're ultra paranoid and it's extremely difficult to even get an account there. I noticed that almost no email address domains are allowed when you try to register. Opinion censorship is over the top, just like farcebook has become. It's one of those dark spots on the web where only the clubhouse regulars who have 10k posts matter. They finally got karma'd. Kinda funny. Couldn't happen to a worse bunch. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|