|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Lawmakers have Chance to Protect Oregonians with Gun-Violence Prevention Bill
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Twenty-two years ago my sister-in-law and three nieces, ages six, three and six months, were shot dead at point blank range by her husband, the children’s father, in Scotts Mills. At the time of this shooting, my sister-in-law and her husband were in the midst of a divorce and she had taken out a restraining order against him. Yet, even with that restraining order, her husband was able to acquire a shotgun that morning. If he would have never gotten his hands on a gun, I might be celebrating my nieces’ birthdays today. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/27/2017)
|
| Violent criminals do NOT care about laws, duh...! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The "assault weapon" ban didn't stop the [World Trade Center/Pentagon] terrorists, Brady checks didn't stop them, the high capacity magazine ban didn't. Right to Carry would have. If it had saved only one tower and the people in it, it would have been worth it. GUN CONTROL KILLS. — LTC Stasski, 9/11/01 |
|
|
