|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Second Amendment group backs Andover Twp. man’s bid to carry gun
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The [SAF] recently announced it was financially backing a township man in his fight against the state's 'justifiable need' law to carry a handgun."
"'That's actually very important because financially it will allow the case to go all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court if it is allowed to get that far,' said Israel Albert Almeida ..."
"Almeida said the foundation is fully financing his efforts."
"'This is part of our ongoing effort to have New Jersey carry laws declared unconstitutional,' said Alan Gottlieb, [SAF] founder ... 'We were drawn to Almeida's case because it provides one more example of how the Garden State's concealed carry law is simply Draconian in the way it is administered.'" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/2/2015)
|
| its long been an axiom in "criminal-friendly" NJ permitting the arming of "high-value/profile" potential victims would impede a number of inimical economic processes. Criminals would lack funds to pay their lawyers, prosecutors and other NJS employees reliant upon its high crime rates would become superfluous and, finally, law-abiding citizens might come to feel so empowered as to start questioning some of NJ's more otre' political processes. That would never do. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States. — Noah Webster in "An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution," 1787, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at p. 56 (New York, 1888). |
|
|
