
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Top Albany Cops Give Thoughts on Gun Law Change
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
President Obama raised more than eyebrows at the White House this month when he declared he would defy Congress and pursue enhanced gun control methods through executive action.
In part, the action would close the “gun show loophole,” which allows some part-time gun sellers to operate without a federal license on the Internet, at flea markets and at gun shows and so avoid the requirement to collect background information from their customers. |
Comment by:
laker1
(1/18/2016)
|
Obama makes new laws all by himself while dismissing Congress and violating the highest law of the land the Constitution. He has done it many times before and in the next year may break his own record in new EO's. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|