|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MO: NRA slams Missouri gun-tax plan to pay for police body cameras
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The National Rifle Association and other gun rights groups have hit back hard at one Missouri lawmaker’s plan to add a tax on guns sold in the state to pay for cameras for police officers."
"Brandon Ellington, a Democratic lawmaker representing the Kansas City region, introduced separate bills that would require all uniformed police officers to wear body cameras and maintain recordings for 30 days, and would establish a tax on firearm sales to pay for the new mandate, Guns.com reported."
"The tax would add a 1 percent cost to every retail sale of handguns and ammunition, with the proceeds sent to a new 'Peace Officer Handgun and Ammunition Sales Tax Fund,' Guns.com reported." ... |
| Comment by:
-none-
(1/14/2015)
|
| driving a wedge between law enforcement and gun owners, even if they're his own constituents...punish the (usually conservative) white gun owner for (usually democrat/liberal welfare state) black crime. The law is an *ss. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(1/14/2015)
|
One wonders at the "logic" of compelling legal gun owners/purchasers to pay for devices to document the actions of illegal gun possessors . If PBCs are determined necessary, then the costs ought to be shared equally among all citizens; law-abiding or criminal. The obvious way is via a sales tax on ordinary purchases even criminals make.
But, the, perhaps this legislator has accepted the premise, ( of some prominent social/government activists and, apparently our president) criminal elements are a "protected class" immune from the consequences of their activities. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
