|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
Millwright66
(4/4/2015)
|
This "crime" happened just prior to the owner leaving for a very popular - with almost everyone except the AG and ATF types - machine gun "shoot". And now all those legal MGs are; where ? Maybe its my suspicious nature, latent misanthropy, or growing distrust of any government agency but I can't see this as a "crime of opportunity". Some intel was involved. And now ATF won't return serialed, hence legal, weapons and devices ? Why ?
We're not talking some wood stock, - ala Gibson Guitars - but completed, functional devices. Even more "curious" is the lack of indictments in this case. So long as the "case" is pending ATF can hold the evidence". Or at least that seems to be the way they see it. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|