|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(9/10/2019)
|
| Political Criminals could care less about Constitutional rights. They have written off one of the greatest documents ever created, and apparently are proud of all they are trying to do, including breaking their Oath of Office to destroy it. They move to make the Freedom that so many men and women have fought and died for.. meaningless... Disgraceful.... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/10/2019)
|
| Yeah, Chuckie, he'll get right on that. [eyecross] |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/10/2019)
|
| Trump can't give the GOP political cover on this subject. If they vote to destroy gun rights, they need to be replaced. |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(9/10/2019)
|
| any congressman who votes for any guncontrol WILL be voted out especially republicans |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/10/2019)
|
I have to wonder just how UpChuck Schumer expects the President to give dems "political cover" to commit what would be career suicide???
Schumer is one deluded libtard. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/10/2019)
|
| *Sigh* I mean give Repubs cover ..... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
