|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Finding Common Ground
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Guns! Oh no, I can see everybody's spine stiffen, and quite honestly I can't really believe I'm gonna wade in here! My God you could argue online 24/7 if you want. You might as well ask who makes the best pizza in town! A lot of people much smarter then me have been pounding both sides of this argument for a long, long time and anybody can Google extreme debate points on both sided of the issue. I'm no expert, these are just my heartfelt ramblings, so please don't judge me too harshly.
|
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/29/2016)
|
Hey, I found the common ground:
I don't want to kill gun grabbers and they don't want to be killed.
So isn't in everybody's best interest if they just stay away from me and leave me (and my civil rights) alone? |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/29/2016)
|
The only "common ground" there is, is the rote Constitution and Bill of Rights, as originally intended and ratified.
If they can't meet on that common ground, then HELL with 'em. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(6/29/2016)
|
| So Sparky, point to where gun control has reduced violent crime. ans: Well, if the Chicago children were not getting their guns from easy gun laws in Indiana the gun laws in Chicago would work. OK, so why does easy Indiana not have the violent crime rate of Chicago anywhere? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
