|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun Free Zone Fails Again on Campus
Submitted by:
Robert Morse
Website: slowfacts.wordpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
If you’re like me, then you hate the idea of a madman hurting our children. Unfortunately, it has been happening for a long time, but probably not the way you think. If a criminal can bring a firearm onto college campus to rob our students, then what is to stop a madman from doing the same thing..or worse?
Here are the latest examples. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(2/22/2018)
|
sro scot petersen hid for 4 min. until police backup arrived while kids were being slaughtered by Cruz
"we may never release the video footage"
npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/02/22/588134195/florida-school-cop-took-no-action-during-last-weeks-s-fatal-shooting
cnn.com/2018/02/22/us/florida-school-shooting/index.html
Israel told reporters Peterson should have "went in. Addressed the killer. Killed the killer." Instead, the deputy waited outside for about four minutes.
Asked how he felt watching the footage, Israel said: "Devastated. Sick to my stomach. There are no words. These families lost their children. We lost coaches. I've been to the funerals, I've been to the homes. ... I've been to the vigils. It's just -- there are no words." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
