NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Do We Need More Second Amendment "Judicial Activism"?
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "I've been writing about this issue, off and on, ever since I took on the site. Know who hasn't been writing about this issue? The U.S. Supreme Court. Their first, last, and only significant Second Amendment ruling, U.S. v. Miller, was handed down in 1939--almost 70 years ago. They aren't saying that the Second Amendment does protect individual gun rights, so city and state laws that modestly restrict gun ownership continue to be approved by federal courts without further appeal. They aren't saying that the Second Amendment doesn't protect gun rights, so legislators are reticent to pass gun control laws. It is the Supreme Court's job to address Constitutional questions, and this Constitutional question remains unanswered. ..." |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|