|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/29/2016)
|
Opponents are misrepresenting the issue, which is arbitrary denial of services and backdoor registration.
First, denial of services for refusing to answer non-medical-related questions that invade privacy is viewpoint discrimination, which is unconstitutional. Next is the inclusion of gun data in the patient's medical files, which is completely inappropriate and becomes a de facto registration of the patient owning guns.
The intrusion into private information peripheral to a patient's medical treatment primarily to satisfy the physician's philosophical opposition to gun ownership is improper. Anti-gun doctors rationalize it as necessary to providing treatment, but that is a falsehood.
They ought to know that WE know what they are up to. |
| Comment by:
AFRet
(2/29/2016)
|
| Just answer NO. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
