|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
kangpc
(1/16/2017)
|
| I'm usually not in favor of "cops only" laws, but in the case of "smart guns" I think they should be available only to cops. |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/16/2017)
|
No it doesn't fire like any other weapon. From the article:
"Kloepfer said his gun is “relatively reliable.”
Relatively reliable doesn't make the grade. When you need a firearm, you don't want "relatively" reliable.
I have had one misfire with a center fire cartridge in my life out of in excess of 10,000 cartridges. That is a reliability rate of 99.99 percent.
Talk to me about smart gun reliability when you reach 99.99% reliability. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
