|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
‘Gun control does not equal gun safety,’ says NSSF head
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
While Barack Obama was delivering a stump speech on the State of the Union last night, the head of the National Shooting Sports Foundation was telling an audience in Las Vegas that gun control proponents are flying a “false flag” of gun safety in an effort to push their agenda.
But NSSF President Steve Sanetti suggested in a speech to a receptive audience that data from the FBI, combined with firearms sales data, is a strong indication that the gun control bandwagon has a broken wheel. Since 1994, he said, firearms sales are up 104 percent. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(1/22/2015)
|
PHOTOS OF HEROES: The Israeli prison guards who were transporting a prisoner when they spotted, chased, and captured the Palestinian terrorist who had stabbed at least 10 Israelis on a Tel Aviv bus.
Were it not for these men and their bravery, the terror attack could have been much worse.
More info: ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4617500,00.html
facebook.com/theisraelproject/posts/10153849958282316
At least ten injured when Palestinian man from West Bank stabs bus driver and passengers on Bus 40 in Tel Aviv.
Why is the UN silent about terror? Stop the hypocrisy. Tell the UN: Start fighting terror, not Israel.
facebook.com/theisraelproject/posts/10153849923517316
facebook.com/theisraelproject/posts/10153849912682316 |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
