|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Are Democrats dangerously delusional about background checks?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A comment the other day by Oregon Rep. Dan Rayfield (D-Corvallis) reported by the Albany Democrat Herald Thursday seems to sum up what many in the Second Amendment community have decided is a dangerously delusional attitude about a proposed “universal background check” bill now headed to the full House in Salem."
"'We still need to close the loopholes,' Rayfield said, according to the newspaper. 'Criminals, as was noted, are still going to attempt to purchase guns. Right now if they can't go through the traditional means they go to private sales, online markets, to gain access to these guns.'"
"Does this guy, or any of his colleagues, have a clue about how criminals really obtain most of their firearms? ..." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(4/27/2015)
|
| "Dangerously" or just merely "delusional", i.e. unable to comprehend or accept the prevailing situational realities. Their mantra of the "gunshot loophole" is one example. Anyone with access to a library or computer can - without referencing any "pro-gun sites- read chapter and verse of ATF regulations governing firearms commerce. There is no "loophole". All firearms transactions in a FFL's "bound book" inventory have to be accounted/approved in a federal form. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
