|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Firearms taken after break-in at western Michigan gun shop
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Firearms have been stolen from a western Michigan gun shop after an SUV was used to ram the business.
Bullet Hole Firearms and Training in Holland was broken into before 4 a.m. Thursday, police said.
The SUV had been reported stolen and was used to allow the thieves to get into the gun shop.
Surveillance video shows four men wearing masks taking an undisclosed number of guns. No arrests have been made.
|
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(3/17/2021)
|
| I've repeatedly observed that these gun store break-ins involve a level of sophistication that suggests that deep state operatives are doing them and/or training people to do them. The ULTIMATE "ghost gun" is a stolen gun (hanging on the walls at CIA hq probably). |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
