|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
RI: Richmond Council Postpones Second Amendment Sanctuary Vote
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
After considerable discussion, Town Council members agreed to postpone a vote on a resolution declaring the town a Second Amendment sanctuary until a larger venue could be found to accommodate all residents who wished to speak. The resolution topped Tuesday’s council meeting agenda, and the council chambers was filled beyond capacity, forcing many people to wait outside. The discussion came on the heels of Monday’s vote in Hopkinton to approve the resolution.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/13/2019)
|
To anti-2A ninnies, any law they deem "reasonable" or "sensible" cannot possibly infringe a constitutional right, by virtue of its "reasonableness" or "sensibility".
Which, of course, is absolutely ridiculous. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|