|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/26/2019)
|
| This Obama judge hangs a fat, slow pitch over the plate, and this must needs be pounced upon for pursuit up to certiorari. Swing for the guddam fences. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/26/2019)
|
Another judge who does not understand what "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" means.
"Common use? ? ?" That's not in the 2A. It isn't a criteria. They may not be "necessary" for some home defense but the AR-15 is a good weapon for it. It is also good for outside use ... and situations involving multiple attackers.
Like antifa .... which seem plentiful out there in the land of fruit and nuts.
|
| Comment by:
lbauer
(7/26/2019)
|
Denying "common use" was a feeble attempt by this judge to duck a direct challenge by avoiding the common use guideline as set by the SCOTUS Heller decision.
Yeah, I know, it's all a violation of our 2A rights, but you have to play the hand you're dealt, and this judge was just caught cheating. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
